Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Coleman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 2, 1986No. 85-461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, the plaintiff’s tenant, appeals from the Superior Court’s (Wyman, J.) denial of his appeal from a district court decision. The issue presented is whether the application of RSA 540:20, which provides that an appeal in a landlord’s action against a tenant must be filed within three days after the rendition of the judgment, violated the defendant’s due process rights. We hold that the statute was interpreted and applied in a way that conflicts with due process, and accordingly reverse and remand.

In February 1985, the plaintiff filed a landlord-tenant action against the defendant.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Baby K.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Appeal of City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. State v. PetersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. In re R.H.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
  5. K & J Associates v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API