Frost v. Phenix
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Appellant-defendants William and Marcia Frost (Frosts) bring this appeal after the trial court granted appellee-plaintiffs Bruce and Susan Phenixes' (Phenixes) motion to correct error following summary judgment in the Frosts' favor.
We affirm.
The evidence favorable to the Phenixes (non-movants on the summary judgment motion) shows that Susan was injured when she fell through a portion of the wood porch floor she was walking on as she returned to her apartment. The deposition testimony established that the Phe-nixes had leased the upper apartment in a house which was divided…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Meadowlark Farms, Inc. v. WarkenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Barnd v. BorstIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hedgecock v. OrloskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Smith v. P. & B. CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. East Chicago Sanitary DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. SellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hacienda Mexican Restaurant of Kalamazoo Corp. v. Hacienda Franchise Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- NN Investors Life Insurance Co v. CrossleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- N. Ind. Pub. Serv. v. E. CHICAGO SAN. D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.