Hedgecock v. Orlosky
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the appellee in an action for personal injuries charged to have been caused by the appellant’s negligent operation of an automobile. The sole error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, in which it is asserted that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and that it is contrary to law.
The undisputed evidence and that most favorable to the appellee tend to establish the following facts: The accident occurred about 6:30 p. m., November 9, 1937, on Indianapolis boulevard in the City of Hammond, which is a heavily traveled…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldsmith v. RiclesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Cousins v. GlassburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Valparaiso v. SchwerdtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Power v. Crown Stage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Lorber v. Peoples Motor Coach Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Jones v. GleimIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Taylor v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.