Spurlino Materials, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Chief Judge:
The petitioner’s employees conducted a strike that they said was intended to protest the company’s unlawful termination of and failure to reinstate a prominent union supporter. At the same time, they honored a clause in an agreement they had with the company not to strike — for any reason — on one particular construction project. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that the strike was indeed aimed at unfair labor practices, and that the employees were entitled to reinstatement when they offered to return to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Novato Healthcare Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Oberthur Technologies of America Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Wendt Corporation v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- New York Party Shuttle v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Hood River Distillers, Inc. v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.