Legal Opinion
Ingram v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1925No. 6736PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBOEN, Circuit Judge.
This writ of error challenges the legality of the proceedings in the court below prior to and at the trial of the defendant Ingram under an indictment for receiving, storing, and concealing a Ford coupe moving as a part of interstate commerce, knowing the same to be stolen, in violation of section 4 of chapter 89 of 41 Statutes at Large, p. 325 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10418e). He was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for three years in the penitentiary.
His counsel first complain that on the 8th day of September, 1923, the court below, after hearing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lesser Cotton Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Barnard v. RandleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Southern Pac. Co. v. SchoerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Robert A. BeckhamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Caringella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Kercheval v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.