Barnard v. Randle
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action against the surety upon a bond, George D. Barnard, the plaintiff in error, and it resulted in a judgment against him for the full amount claimed in the petition. The first specification of error is that the demurrer to the petition should have been sustained, because it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The defendant in error, Charles H. Randle, alleged in his petition that on October 29, 1892, George D. Barnard, as surety for A. C. Ricksecker, entered into a bond to the defendant in error in the penal sum of $5,000,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. MaresSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cooper v. OmohundroSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Woodson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Bank of Waterproof v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. v. HortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.