Legal Opinion

Goldsborough v. Hewitt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 2129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Supplemental opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

TURNER, Vice Chief Justice.

Since handing down the opinion and rendering judgment in this cause (Goldsborough et al. v. Hewitt, 23 Okla. 66, 99 Pac. 907), the death of Robert Hewitt," defendant in error, has been suggested to this court for the first time and proved to have occurred between the submission and opinion herein, to wit, August 13, 1908. While the fact of said death between said submission and decision does not impair the validity of said judgment, in order to preserve all rights thereunder, said judgment is hereby set aside, said opinion and mandate recalled, and the clerk of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Streitwolf v. StreitwolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Danforth v. DanforthIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Powe v. McLeod & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boyes v. MastersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Kaw Boiler Works v. FrymyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Owens v. MoraineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API