Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Keating
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 25, 1997No. 15262PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaver Y, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff after a hearing in damages. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly granted judgment in favor of the plaintiff where there was no admissible evidence as to the principal amount of the debt, the rate of interest or the rate and reasonableness of substituted interest, and the amount of interest claimed. We reverse the judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
The trial court could have reasonably found the following facts. On October 2, 1987, the defendants, John T. Keating and Neal J.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bell Food Services, Inc. v. SherbacowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. JaynesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Central Bank v. Colonial Romanelli AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Coelm v. ImperatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- SKW Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. GallicchioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Webster Bank v. FlanaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. MonizConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Willow Funding C. v. Grencom Associates, No. Cv 95-0146003 S (Jan. 19, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000