Legal Opinion
Bell Food Services, Inc. v. Sherbacow
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 19, 1991No. 14031PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The issues in this breach of contract action are whether the trial court correctly: (1) awarded damages to the plaintiffs, Bell Food Services, Inc. (BFS), and Philip Madder, for breach of contract; and (2) admitted two pieces of evidence as falling within exceptions to the rule against hearsay. Mackler had entered into an agreement to purchase the interest in BFS of the defendant, Fred Sherbaeow, its former president. As part of the agreement, the defendant had warranted that BFS had no outstanding corporate debt. After the purchase, the department of revenue services assessed BFS with a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. DamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.