Coelm v. Imperato
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff, Coelm, a Connecticut partnership, brought this action to recover the balance due on the defendant’s account with the plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, Elm City Filling Stations, Inc. (Elmco), after Elmco assigned its accounts receivable to the plaintiff. The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment, after a court trial, for the defendant. On appeal, it makes four claims arguing that the trial court improperly (1) precluded testimony, (2) refused to grant a continuance, (3) acted prejudicially, and (4) denied its *147motion for a new trial. Because the first issue raised…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Morales v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Royal Sundry Co. v. Railroad Salvage of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. ErratoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Central Bank v. Colonial Romanelli AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. PearlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- O'Sullivan v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. KeatingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.