Wishnefsky v. RILEY AND FANNELL, PC
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtMontemuro, J.
¶ 1 This is a pro se appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant/Appellee Riley and Fañelli, P.C., in an action grounded on theories of breach of contract and fraud. The same order denied Appellant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.
¶ 2 The basis of this case is an alleged oral contract between Appellee, a law firm, and Appellant, a non-lawyer, governing a fee-splitting arrangement. In his Complaint, 1 Appellant. contends that Appellee agreed to pay him a forwarding fee of one third of the compensation received from cases he referred, but ceased to,do so after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Albright v. Abington Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Mitchell v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1804
- Fowler v. Scully ex rel. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morris & Doherty, PC v. LockwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Total Containment, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- SCF Consulting, LLC v. Barrack, Rodos & BacineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- SCF Consulting, LLC v. Barrack RodosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- SCF Consulting, LLC v. Barrack, Rodos & BacineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.