Legal Opinion
Palpar, Inc. v. Thayer
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 1953No. Civ. 14934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Phases of this litigation, which involves an action for the partition of a tractor originally purchased in 1941 and which counsel on oral argument admitted has now very little value by reason of the ravages of time, have been twice previously before this court on appeal. (Palpar, Inc. v. Thayer, 82 Cal.App.2d 578 [186 P.2d 748] ; Id., 91 Cal.App. 2d 176 [204 P.2d 654].) The tractor was originally purchased by Thayer and Morton as tenants in common. Palpar, Inc. has succeeded to Morton’s interest and Miller has acquired Thayer’s. While Thayer was in exclusive possession of the tractor Thayer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Foltz v. WertIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kirby Lumber Co. v. Temple Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Willmon v. KoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Vaughan v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Carlyle v. JaskiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- American Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. SperosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Southern Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Stephens v. Baker and BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.