Falls v. United States Savings, Loan & Building Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from City Court of Birmingham. Tried before Hon. W. W. Wilke&son. Appellee filed a bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by Mattie D. Falls, a married woman, which mortgage was executed to secure a note of which the following is a copy: “$10,000. _ St. Paul, Minn., May 10th, 1890. “For value received, after three years from date, and before nine years from date, we promise to pay to the order of the United States Savings, Loan & Building Company, at the office of its…
Read the full summary
Appeal from City Court of Birmingham. Tried before Hon. W. W. Wilke&son. Appellee filed a bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by Mattie D. Falls, a married woman, which mortgage was executed to secure a note of which the following is a copy: “$10,000. _ St. Paul, Minn., May 10th, 1890. “For value received, after three years from date, and before nine years from date, we promise to pay to the order of the United States Savings, Loan & Building Company, at the office of its Treasurer, St. Paul, or to its Trustee in Minneapolis, Minn., the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars, with interest at the rate…
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
— In Code of 1886, § 2790, is this language: “The proceedings of any legislative body purporting on the face of the book to be printed by authority of the government, State or Territory, are evidence without further proof.” A book published in St. Paul, Minnesota, in 1879, was offered in evidence to prove the statute law of that State. It was objected to. The title page of the bool, has these words: “The general statutes of the State of Minnesota, prepared by George B. Young.” Immediately succeeding the foregoing statement is found the following: “Edited and published under the authority of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Farrior v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Cubbedge, Hazlehurst & Co. v. NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Dawson v. BurrusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Lamkin v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Building & Loan Ass'n of Dakota v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.