Legal Opinion
Colyer v. Harris
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 31, 1981No. C-3-79-267PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE BASED UPON THEORY THAT MAGISTRATE’S ACTIONS ARE TANTAMOUNT TO GRANTING OF A DEFAULT JUDGMENT; MAGISTRATE’S REPORT REJECTED IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OVERRULED; CASE REMANDED TO DEFENDANT FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant’s Motion, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), seeking Court review of the Magistrate’s Recommendation that Plaintiff’s Motion for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Santise v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- James LeMASTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Henderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Santise v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Perkins v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Perkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.