Legal Opinion
Santise v. Schweiker
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 8, 1982No. Nos. 81-1904 to 81-1910, 81-2026 to 81-2032, 81-2722 and 81-2725PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
We are asked in this appeal to decide whether certain medical-vocational regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS” or “Department”) satisfy the requirements of the Social Security Act. The district court concluded that the regulations — which take the form of a “grid” and are used in determining eligibility for disability benefits— are at variance with both the Act and previous decisions of this Court. We disagree, and therefore will reverse.
I
For more than a quarter-century, disabled workers and their dependents have…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Robert H. KANE, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Santise v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Julia DORF, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Silvestre Chavez v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- GARCIA, Emilio, Appellant, v. SCHWEIKER, Richard S., Secretary Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.