Legal Opinion

Buckner v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 25, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries. The issues submitted to the jury were answered as follows:

1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his injury? Answer: Yes.

3. Notwithstanding the negligence of the plaintiff, could the defendants have avoided the injury by the exercise of ordinary care? Answer: Yes.

4. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $5,500.

From judgment upon the verdict defendants appealed to the Supreme Court. On 17…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Gunter v. . WickerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Ray v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Hudson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Frank J. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  2. Redmon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Newbern v. . LearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Caudle v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Hendrix v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API