Legal Opinion

Gunter v. . Wicker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Civil ’Actiom for damages, tried at Fall Term, 1880, of Chatham Superior Court, before Eure, J. Verdict and judgment 'for plaintiff, appeal by defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The plaintiff, employed as foreman in running the steam saw mill of the defendants, and who had been in their service for five months, among other duties assigned, was required to oil the machinery after cutting up the third log, an'd also of every one thousand shingles made. The defendant Wicker, one of the partnership proprietors and the general manager of the business under whose control the plaintiff worked, was personally attending to the sawing. The third log had been cut and the machinery stopped, when the plaintiff as he was accustomed to do, and) had before done with defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doggett v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Deans v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Bullock v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Clark v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API