Legal Opinion

Kipnis v. County of Maricopa

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 11, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

The question before us is whether unpaid assessments levied by an irrigation district on land while it was owned by the State and leased to others remained a charge on the land after it was purchased from the State by appellant.

We are concerned with 80 acres of land within the area served by the Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage District, an irrigation district organized pursuant to Ch. 6 of Tit. 45 of our Revised Statutes also possessing drainage powers.1 The State of Arizona owned the land in question for many years prior to 1959, and leased it to a succession of lessees,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State of Arizona v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. City of Phoenix v. Borden CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Graham CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Maricopa County v. Fox Riverside Theatre Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arizona Telco Federal Credit Union v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  2. Kipnis v. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. ARIZ. TELCO FED. CR. U. v. Dept. of Rev.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API