Legal Opinion

Kipnis v. County of Maricopa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1970No. 9801-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an action by Harry Kipnis, appellant, to recover taxes paid to Maricopa County, Arizona, under protest. The Superior Court rendered judgment against Kipnis in favor of the County, and he appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed, 10 Ariz.App. 174, 457 P.2d 714, and we granted review. Opinion of the Court of Appeals vacated.

The facts out of which this dispute originated are relatively simple. In 1922, appellee, the Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, was organized as an irrigation district under the provisions of what is now A.R.S. Title 45,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Murphey v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2 v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Toole County Irrigation District v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Kipnis v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. Wasatch Bank of Pleasant GroveUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  3. Arizona Telco Federal Credit Union v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Lamos v. Consolidated Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. ARIZ. TELCO FED. CR. U. v. Dept. of Rev.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API