Legal Opinion

State v. Herrera-Bustamante

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 20, 2018No. S18A0703PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAHMIAS, Justice.

*554**259Moises Herrera-Bustamante was convicted after a jury found him guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol and having an open container of alcohol. About a year later, while his motion for new trial was pending, this Court decided Olevik v. State, 302 Ga. 228, 806 S.E.2d 505 (2017), which held that under the compelled self-incrimination clause of the Georgia Constitution, individuals have the right to refuse to take a breathalyzer test. Herrera-Bustamante then amended his motion for new trial to argue for the first time that evidence that he refused to consent to a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  5. Olevik v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  5. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API