State v. Herrera-Bustamante
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
NAHMIAS, Justice.
*554**259Moises Herrera-Bustamante was convicted after a jury found him guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol and having an open container of alcohol. About a year later, while his motion for new trial was pending, this Court decided Olevik v. State, 302 Ga. 228, 806 S.E.2d 505 (2017), which held that under the compelled self-incrimination clause of the Georgia Constitution, individuals have the right to refuse to take a breathalyzer test. Herrera-Bustamante then amended his motion for new trial to argue for the first time that evidence that he refused to consent to a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Olevik v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.