Legal Opinion

King County V. Aquatherm Gmbh

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 23, 2026No. 85572-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY, a Washington municipal corporation, No. 85572-7-I (consolidated with No. 85595-6-I) Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. ORDER GRANTING AQUATHERM GMBH, a German MOTION TO PUBLISH entity, Appellant, and AQUATHERM L.P., a Delaware limited partnership; AETNA NA L.C. f/k/a AQUATHERM NA L.C., a Utah limited liability company, AQUATHERM INC., a Utah corporation, RIDGELINE MECHANICAL SALES, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS, INC., a Delaware limited liability company, WOOD HARBINGER INC., a Washington…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API