Legal Opinion

Alguila v. Safety Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 7, 1993PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

This is one of three cases we decide today involving the definition of an “underinsured” automobile in a standard Massachusetts automobile insurance policy prescribed by G. L. c. 175, § 113L(2), as amended by St. 1988, c. 273, § 46. The policy in each case was issued by Safety Insurance Company, the defendant in this case. See Safety Ins. Co. v. Laurent, post 500 (1993); Fleurgin v. Safety Ins. Co., post 503 (1993).

The policy provides:

“Sometimes an owner or operator of an auto legally responsible for an accident is underinsured. Under this Part, we will pay damages for bodily injury to people…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Save-Mor Supermarkets, Inc. v. Skelly Detective Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Allstate Insurance v. BearceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. T.F. v. B.L.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Gomes v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Smart v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. QuaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API