Alguila v. Safety Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
This is one of three cases we decide today involving the definition of an “underinsured” automobile in a standard Massachusetts automobile insurance policy prescribed by G. L. c. 175, § 113L(2), as amended by St. 1988, c. 273, § 46. The policy in each case was issued by Safety Insurance Company, the defendant in this case. See Safety Ins. Co. v. Laurent, post 500 (1993); Fleurgin v. Safety Ins. Co., post 503 (1993).
The policy provides:
“Sometimes an owner or operator of an auto legally responsible for an accident is underinsured. Under this Part, we will pay damages for bodily injury to people…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Save-Mor Supermarkets, Inc. v. Skelly Detective Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Allstate Insurance v. BearceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- T.F. v. B.L.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Gomes v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Smart v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. QuaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.