Legal Opinion

People v. Altman

New York District Court

Decided October 23, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fbaítk X. Altimabi, J.

Defendant Paul Altman has been charged with violating -a Town of Hempstead ordinance which prohibited seaplanes from taking off or landing upon any portion of the channel system of the Town of Hempstead except in emergency situations. The defendant has admitted landing his aircraft in Reynolds Channel, Town of Hempstead, in violation of section 15 of article II of Ordinance No. 7 on two occasions.

The particular ordinance provides: “.Section 15. No seaplane shall take off or land upon any portion of the channel system of the Town of Hempstead, except in case of .an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. City of Lake AngelusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Garden State Farms, Inc. v. BaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Garden State Farms, Inc. v. Mayor Louis Bay, IISupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart, Inc. v. DowlingCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
  5. Gustafson v. City of Lake AngelusDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API