Legal Opinion

H. F. Mitchell Construction Co. v. Orange County Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1964No. 741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Defendant assigns as error the refusal to allow its motion to nonsuit. It does not except to the findings of fact. If plaintiff offered competent evidence on which the court could find that rock had been excavated, as required by the contract, the motion to nonsuit was properly overruled. This is true even though the record also contains incompetent evidence admitted over defendant’s objections. Reverie Lingerie, Inc. v. McCain, 258 N.C. 353, 128 S.E. 2d 835; In re Simmons, 256 N.C. 184, 123 S.E. 2d 614; Insurance Company v. Shaffer, 250 N.C. 45, 108 S.E. 2d 49; Bradsher v. Morton, 249 N.C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Ingold v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Mayberry v. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Reverie Lingerie, Inc. v. McCainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ballance v. WentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Lentz v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API