Legal Opinion

Petkovsek v. Snyder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of petitioner that Family Court erred in failing to include rental and investment income in the 1995 gross income of respondent for purposes of calculating his child support obligation. The record establishes that the rental income of respondent was entirely offset by his rental losses in 1995. An increase in the principal of respondent’s Keough retirement plan does not constitute investment income under the provisions of Family Court Act § 413 (1) (b) (5) (ii). The record establishes that all of the income earned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marsh v. FieramuscaNew York City Family Court · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bow v. BowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Pringle v. PringleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Cupkova-Myers v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API