Marsh v. Fieramusca
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John F. O’Donnell, J.
Both parties have filed objections to an order of a Hearing Examiner fixing support for the parties’ son, Charles. Pursuant to a property settlement agreement incorporated but not merged in their judgment of divorce, the respondent Fieramusca paid unallocated support until petitioner Marsh’s remarriage. She has remarried and the parties have stipulated that the Family Court proceedings should be treated as an initial determination of support.
The petitioner objects to the Hearing Examiner’s failure to include in respondent’s income: (a) contributions…
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of MuggeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Skinner v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Petkovsek v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Costanza v. CostanzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- S. G. v. D. M.New York City Family Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.