Legal Opinion
Pringle v. Pringle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Amended order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an amended order of Family Court confirming the findings of fact of the Hearing Examiner, which upwardly mod*967ified the basic child support obligation of respondent and his pro rata share of daycare and uninsured healthcare expenses. Contrary to respondent’s contention, petitioner sustained her burden of showing an unanticipated and unreasonable change of circumstances, and a concomitant showing of need, warranting an increase in child support in the best interests of the children (see, Matter of Brescia v…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- MATTER OF CASSANO v. CassanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Merl v. MerlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brefka v. DobiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bow v. BowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Malecki v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pringle v. PringleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Terrell v. TerrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Annette M.R. v. John W.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007