Legal Opinion

Mandelos v. Karavasidis

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1995PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying summary judgment to defendant as to the Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 causes of action and, as so modified, affirmed.

The lower courts should not have granted summary judgment, sua sponte on searching the record, to defendant because material issues of fact exist as to whether the subject properties qualified for the Labor Law exception (Labor Law § 240 [1]; § 241).

The record discloses a triable issue of fact, at least regarding the threshold "one- or two-family dwelling”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Amerogen v. DonniniNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Khela v. NeigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Ortega v. PucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Chowdhury v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Truppi v. BusciglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Outwater v. BallisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API