Legal Opinion
Amerogen v. Donnini
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1991PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied.
Plaintiff was injured when he fell from a porch roof of a four-bedroom house. He had been hired to repair the roof by defendant Samuel Donnini, whose wife, Marsini Donnini, owned the property. She had purchased it in 1970 and since that time continuously used the house solely for rental to college students.
A divided Appellate Division reversed Supreme Court’s denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this action for damages resulting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cannon v. PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Radich v. Council of the City of LackawannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Radich v. Council of the City of LackawannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by97 opinions
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bartoo v. BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Acosta v. HadjigavrielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- DeSabato v. 674 Carroll Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Fisher v. CoghlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.