Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2006No. CC 01C10035; CA A121726; SC S52819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

In this post-conviction case, the Court of Appeals held that the post-conviction court erred in failing to void petitioner’s convictions. Hinton v. Hill, 197 Or App 238, 105 P3d 923, on recons, 201 Or App 131, 117 P3d 1066 (2005). We allowed defendant’s (superintendent’s) petition for review to determine whether the post-conviction court’s alternative remedy was consistent with the authority granted to the post-conviction court in the Post-Conviction Hearing Act. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the Court of Appeals decision and affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

In the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shipman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Semmes v. WilliardOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hinton v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Decker v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Decker v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API