Legal Opinion

Hart v. Miller

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 16, 1985No. 472, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES S. GETTY, Judge,

Specially Assigned.

The right to be wrong without incurring reversal is not absolute. Rosenberg, Judicial Discretion of the Trial Court, 22 Syracuse Law Review 635 (1971).

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in dismissing a plaintiffs case for counsel’s failure to answer interrogatories in a timely manner. We shall reverse and remand this case for imposition of a less onerous penalty.

A review of the record establishes that on May 15, 1980, Paul M. Hart, one of the appellants herein, sustained a serious physical injury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Berryman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Shimer v. EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Gunning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Sindler v. LitmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Maddox v. StoneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Judge v. R & T CONSTRUCTION CO.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API