Legal Opinion

Berryman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1977No. 11366PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Convicted by a jury of assault with intent to commit rape while armed, assault with intent to comment rape, and assault with a dangerous weapon, appellant contends on appeal that the trial court committed reversible error by (1) denying his motion for a court-ordered lineup and (2) by permitting the case to go to a jury when the government had failed to establish a prima facie case. We affirm. 1

On November 12, 1975, at approximately 7:30 p. m., complainant was accosted by a man at gunpoint in the northwest section of this city. While the previous heavy rain had stopped, it…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Petition of RMGDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API