Legal Opinion

Stalbird Et Ux. v. Town of Washington

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

This is an action of contract whereby the plaintiffs seek to recover damages for the breach of an agreement involving the sale of a stone wall for highway uses. At the trial below, a .verdict was ordered for the defendant. The plaintiffs allege error.

In 1926, a State aid road improvement project was undertaken in the defendant town on the main highway from Washington to Chelsea. Agreeably to the statute, G-. L. 4586, the State highway commissioner appointed C. E. Stanley as foreman in charge of the work. The contract in question was made with the plaintiffs by Stanley, and the stone from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Town of New Haven v. WestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  3. Schlessinger v. Forest Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  4. Maynard v. Town of WestfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  5. Town of Topsham v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valley Realty & Development, Inc. v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. In re Petition of Acorn Energy Solar 2, LLC (Therese Holmes and Timothy Holmes, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  3. In re Estate of SmithHamilton County Probate Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API