Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Taylor. Tried below before Hon. D. G. Hill.

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Associate Justice.

Upon the trial of this cause, which was an action to recover damages for injuries to a car of horses occasioned by the negligence of appellant, the court defined negligence to be “the failure to do what a reasonable and prudent person would ordinarily have done under the circumstances of the situation, or doing what such a person under the existing circumstances would not have done.” To this charge the first error is assigned.

While we are not disposed to sanction the use of the words “a reasonable and prudent person,” rather than the often approved expression “a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Railway Co. v. OramTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. LockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CurlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Helms Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API