Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Brady
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 10, 1983No. 82-784PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD
delivered the opinion of the court:
Russell A. Brady appeals from an order which granted the petition of Cathleen E. Brady, now known as Cathleen E. Vacek, the custodial parent of Danna Brady, to remove the child from Illinois to Texas.
He contends that the order did not comply with the July 1, 1982, amendment to the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act:
“The court may grant leave, before or after judgment, to any party having custody of any minor child or children to remove such child or children from Illinois whenever such approval is in the best…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hupp v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Custody of HarneIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Arrington v. Walter E. Heller International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Heiser v. ChastainAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- In Re Marriage of BurghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SchlosserUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Yannas v. Frondistou-YannasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- In Re Marriage of EckertIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Custody of AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.