Legal Opinion

Didisheim Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 27, 1926No. 2669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Timers or stop watches for measuring time in speed contests, having 7 jewels in the escapement, were imported at the port of New York, and classified by the collector as clockwork mechanisms, or mechanisms for measuring time, having more than 4 jewels in the escapement. The timers or stop watches were accordingly assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem and $4 each under paragraph 368 of the Tariff Act of 19.22, which reads as follows:

Par. 368. Clocks * * * and any device or mechanism having an essential operating feature intended for measuring time, distance, or fares, or the flowage'…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Hengerer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Mitsui & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API