State v. Wilkinson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant Jack Wilkinson appeals his jury conviction, arguing that the trial court incorrectly denied his motion to suppress evidence. 1 Although the totality of the circumstances created reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to justify stopping Wilkinson, see Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 331-32, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990) (holding reliable informant tip provided reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, given totality of circumstances), the circumstances did not create reasonable suspicion that Wilkinson was armed so as to justify a Terry frisk, see…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019