Kile v. Tubbs
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, the District Court, Eifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.
This is an action to recover the possession of eighty acres of land. The evidence shows that in 1859, one Stayton had a house, corral, orchard, and garden, on the tract in dispute, and resided in the house with his family, claiming a large tract of three hundred and twenty acres, which included the eighty acres in controversy. On the fourth day of April, 1859, while thus in possession, he with his wife executed and delivered a deed to one John Thompson, conveying to him the whole three hundred and twenty acres, and delivered the possession to the latter; and the present plaintiffs claim under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doll v. MeadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Winter v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Keane v. CannovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Peter v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Summers v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Joy v. StumpOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Burling v. ThompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Kile v. TubbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Lockey v. HorskyMontana Supreme Court · 1882
- Rosecrans v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.