Legal Opinion

Oregon Liquor Control Commission v. Coe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

During the time involved in this case, defendants were in business at Bingen in the state of Washington, and were engaged in the wholesale distribution of beer and other alcoholic liquors.

In its complaint, the commission, after alleging that defendants were partners and engaged in business as above stated; and that the Oregon Liquor Control Commission was and is an instrumentality of the State of Oregon created and existing under the provisions of the Oregon Liquor Control Act, Oregon Laws 1933, Second Sp. Sess., p. 38, further alleges:

“That between the said 1st day of June, 1934, and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall, Secretary of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Gibson v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1914

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moe v. AlsopOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bohner v. Ace American InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Eaton v. County Court of Cabell CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Scovell v. TRK Trans, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Scovell v. TRK Trans, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API