Legal Opinion

Remes v. Duby

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1978No. Docket 77-3200PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After Remand

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of summary judgment for defendants. The trial judge based his order on the failure of the plaintiffs to raise a genuine issue as to any material fact. GCR 1963, 117.2(3).

This is not the first time that this action has been before our Court. In Remes v Duby, 69 Mich App 265; 244 NW2d 440 (1976), this Court reversed a trial court order of summary judgment. Plaintiffs were granted, on remand, an opportunity to amend their pleadings to include specific allegations as to the defendant attorneys’ part in directing the alleged trespass of deputy sheriffs…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Remes v. DubyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. SSC Associates Ltd. Partnership v. General Retirement SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Goldman v. Loubella ExtendablesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Bardoni v. KimMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Crossley v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Regualos v. Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API