Firstar Bank of Burlington v. Hawkeye Paving Corp.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The children of a deceased worker claim a workers’ compensation carrier lost its lien on the children’s recovery from the third party responsible for their father’s death because the insurer did not file a notice of its hen pursuant to Iowa Code section 85.22(1) (1989). The district court ruled after a bench trial that the insurer’s omission was excused because the children had not served the insurer with a copy of the original notice of its suit against the third party as required by section 85.22. We agree and affirm.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Neither party disputes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Voss v. State, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Henriksen v. Younglove ConstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Shirley v. PothastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Sourbier v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Fisher v. Keller Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drahaus v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Rethamel v. HaveySupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Matter of Estate of RenwanzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Darrow v. QUAKER OATS COMPANYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997