Oxford Orphanage v. . Kittrell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
While tbe defendants, heirs at law of John R. Moss, tbe testator, in their answer claim title to tbe locus in quo, they do not allege that tbe plaintiff refused to accept or, having accepted, later rejected the devise, so as to invoke tbe terms of tbe reverter clause. Instead, in support of their claim, they allege that tbe deterioration and destruction of tbe buildings was due to tbe negligence of tbe life tenant and constitutes acts of waste; that tbe removal of structures therefrom was wrongful and unlawful; that it was tbe duty of tbe remainderman to prevent tbe loss and destruction of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- St. James v. Bagley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Saint Peter's Church v. BragawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Hall v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ange v. AngeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Washington City Board of Education v. EdgertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Patterson v. . BrandonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946