Legal Opinion

Young v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 30, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Mass.R.Civ.P. 56[b], 365 Mass. 824 [1974]) was granted in the plaintiff’s action for damages brought on the defendant’s alleged breach of a lease between the plaintiff as lessee and the defendant as lessor. On appeal the plaintiff’s sole contention is that there remains a “genuine issue as to a ... material *806fact” (Mass.R.Civ.P. 56 [c], 365 Mass. 824 [1974]), namely, whether the defendant’s notice to terminate, given June 10, 1970, pursuant to the “redevelopment rider” to the lease, was given without a good faith intent to “redevelop” the premises…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Aerostatic Engineering Corp. v. SzczawinskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  3. Ratner v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Fassas v. First Bank & Trust Co. of ChelmsfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Henchey v. CoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Imprescia v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Milton Savings Bank v. AmelungMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. CrestaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API