Legal Opinion

Ratner v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 2, 1960PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiffs allege that they were the owners of a building; that the defendant sometime during the period from May 1 to July 1, 1952, contracted with the plaintiffs to bring to full operating capacity the water sprinkler system, which the defendant many years before had installed in the building; and that the defendant failed to make the system fully operable with the result that a fire which occurred in the building in November, 1952, almost completely destroyed the building. The defendant’s answer was a general denial and a plea of res judicata.

Befor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mackintosh v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Franklin v. North Weymouth Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Cleaveland v. Malden Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Willett v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Forman v. WolfsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Francis A. Willhauck, Jr. v. Paul HalpinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Boyd v. Jamaica Plain Co-Operative BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Exxon Mobil v. HealeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  5. MaldonadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API