Legal Opinion

Kotzur v. Kelly

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 24, 1990No. 13-89-307-CVPublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEYS, Justice.

This appeal is taken from a summary judgment in a legal malpractice case. Finding the absence of an attorney-client relationship, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Kelly, the defendant attorney. Appellants, the Kotzurs, bring three points of error. We reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.

The sole factual issue raised concerns the existence of an attorney-client relationship. By their second point of error, appellants argue that the trial court erred when it considered Kelly’s defective and incompetent summary judgment proof. We agree. Kelly’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Gant v. DeLeonTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nicholson v. Memorial Hospital SystemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Marchal v. Webb, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  2. Banc One Capital Partners Corp. v. KneipperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Blanche v. First Nationwide Mortgage Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  4. Peerenboom v. HSP Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  5. Perez v. Kirk & Carrigan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API