Legal Opinion

State v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1998No. C8-97-1759PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

The issues presented in this first-degree murder appeal relate to evidentiary rulings of the trial court. The appellant, Henry Laverne Patterson, asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by precluding the testimony of an undisclosed witness as a sanction for violation of the discovery rules. Patterson also asserts that the trial court erred in allowing an individual whom the defense alleged committed the murders to testify as to the impact of the allegation on his employment and personal life. Because we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. PalubickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. TovarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. AsfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. BudreauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API