Richard L. Marshall v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Marshall has appealed for the second time from the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He again attacks the validity of the sentence imposed but this was determined adversely to him on his prior appeal. Marshall v. United States, 10 Cir., 299 F.2d 141, certiorari denied 370 U.S. 958, 82 S.Ct. 1606, 8 L.Ed.2d 824. Additionally he asserts that he was unconstitutionally denied counsel at the time of his first arraignment.
The record shows that at arraignment the court advised Marshall of his right to counsel and Marshall replied that he was thinking about hiring a lawyer whom he named. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Latham v. CrouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Theodore Way v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Richard L. Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- David Lord Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Carl BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Chin Kee v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Gueldner v. HeydDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Sisson v. PageDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1968