Legal Opinion

David Lord Johnson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1964No. 7631_1PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate and set aside the sentence imposed after conviction by jury verdict upon a two-count indictment charging the appellant with forcible entry of a building belonging to the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115, and stealing therefrom, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. Appellant’s primary contentions are to the effect that he was not afforded effective assistance of counsel at every step of the criminal proceedings, and was denied compulsory process and a speedy trial,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Sterling H. Nickens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  4. Moss v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Snell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Dezso John Lokos v. Walter Capps, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Houser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Dana Blum, United States of America v. Chester BlumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Lonnie Mitchell v. Dan D. Stephens, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. James Pickens Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API