Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Investigation

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 6, 2006No. 04GJ4381PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

At issue in this grand jury proceeding is whether a non-target witness in a grand jury proceeding or the witness’ former spouse, who is a potential target, may (i) quash the witness’ subpoena by asserting that the questions expected to be posed to the witness in the grand jury proceeding are the fruit of illegal electronic surveillance; or (ii) require the government to affirm or deny the existence of illegal electronic surveillance on the basis of mere speculation that such surveillance occurred. Also at issue is whether the non-witness ex-spouse may…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. In re 2018 Grand Jury of Dallas County v. John DoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
  3. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API