Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Waterfront Com'n of New York Harbor

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 4, 1955PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Once again, the federal courts are faced with a challenge to the constitutionality of the Waterfront Compact between the states of New York and New Jersey. 1 This is an action by William V. Bradley, individually and as President of the International Longshoremen’s Association, on behalf of its members, and James S. Castellano to permanently enjoin the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor from enforcing Articles IX and XII of the Compact and the Amendment to Regulation No. 7, promulgated pursuant to Article XII on March 17, 1955, effective April 1, 1955.

Thi…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sarisohn v. Appellate Division, Second Department, Supreme Court of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  2. De Veau v. BraistedNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. De Veau v. BraistedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. Hazelton v. MurraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API